Newsletter: What Fast Company Missed About Sponsorship šÆ ; The Best Partnerships Donāt Stop at One Activation š ; Never Build Your Marketing on Rented Land š¬
Every once in a while, I read an article that makes me stop and think:
āWait a minute⦠Iām not sure I agree with that.ā
Thatās exactly what happened when Larry Weil (aka The Sponsorship Guy) and I read a recent Fast Company article featuring executives explaining how they decide whether to sponsor conferences.
To be clear, itās a good article. In fact, I recommend reading it.
But as Larry and I talked it through, we realized that some of the advice sounded right on the surface⦠yet didnāt align with what weāve seen over decades of working with sponsors and sponsorship sellers.
That raised an interesting question:
What did the article get rightāand what did it miss?
Thatās exactly what weāll explore in our next LinkedIn Live.
This isnāt a critique for the sake of criticizing.
Itās an opportunity to challenge a few assumptions about sponsorship that almost everyoneāincluding experienced professionalsātakes for granted.
If you want to sharpen your thinking about sponsorship, I think youāll enjoy this conversation.
š Click āAttendā on LinkedIn to get a reminder
āļø Partnership Notes
Two partnership insights that matter.
š„ āThe best partnerships donāt stop at one activationā.
Aspire Bakeries, home to the Otis Spunkmeyer brand, helped raise a record-breaking donation for the Sodexo Stop Hunger Foundation through Sodexoās Spirit of Giving campaign. Rather than simply writing a check, the companies layered product promotions, employee engagement, and customer participation into a single partnership. The takeaway for nonprofits: every successful activation should spark the question, āWhat else?ā Donāt limit a corporate partnership to one campaign or event. The strongest partnerships grow by finding new ways for employees, customers, and the community to participate over time.
š āWant bigger sponsorships? Build a bigger storyā.
Pittsburghās Fourth of July celebration attracted $350,000 in sponsorships by positioning itself as more than a fireworks show. Itās an engine for tourism, local business, community prideāand even cause marketing. One activation last week, the āPiatt Companies Salute to Service Wheelā, donated 50% of ticket sales to a local veterans nonprofit. The takeaway: sponsors donāt just fund great events. They fund platforms that create value for the community in multiple ways.
š¤ Marketing Your Cause
One move you should steal.
š¬ āNever build your marketingāor your audienceāon someone elseās landā.
A new study tracked 100 once-successful blogs and found the median site lost 85% of its Google traffic after search, and AI reshaped how people discover content. The survivors had one thing in common: they werenāt dependent on Google. They had built trusted brands, loyal email subscribers, and communities that followed them wherever they went. The takeaway for nonprofit marketers: every social platform, search engine, and AI tool is rented space. Your email list, your reputation, and your direct relationships with supporters are assets you ownāand theyāre becoming more valuable every day.
š Cool Jobs in Cause
Find your next adventure.
š¤ Associate National Director, Corporate Development, āBreakthrough T1Dā, Northeast Remote
š¤ Director, Corporate Philanthropy, āNational Scleroderma Foundationā, Remote
š¤ Senior Account Manager, Corporate Partnerships, āNational Park Foundationā, Washington, D.C.
š§ š Brain Food
One thing that is feeding my thinking.
š± āUsing AI responsibly starts with making it work lessā.
This article makes a practical point about AIās hidden costs: every prompt has a financial cost and an environmental one. The biggest surprise is how much file formats matter. Simple formats like TXT, Markdown, and CSV are much easier for AI to process, while DOCX, PPTX, PDFs, spreadsheets, and images require far more energy and compute. The takeaway: draft, revise, and iterate in lightweight text first, then generate the polished file only when youāre ready.
BTW, I asked AI to evaluate my own habits using Andyās recommendations. It gave me high marks (8.5ā9 out of 10), noting that I primarily work in text and use AI to sharpen my thinking rather than replace it. Thatās exactly the goal. Responsible AI use isnāt just about what you askāitās also about how efficiently and thoughtfully you ask it.