Newsletter: Who Should You Really Call About Partnerships? βοΈ ; Big Wins Come From Flywheels, Not Moments π ; Is the Next Competitive Edge Decency? π€
Most partnership conversations donβt fail because the idea is bad.
They fail because you called the wrong person. Awkward, right?
I canβt tell you how many times Iβve heard someone say, βWe reached out to the person who handles partnerships and never heard back.β Or worseββThe company isnβt interested.β
But hereβs a better question:
Who at the company told you that?
My friend Courtney Davidson at Breakthrough T1D recently commented that her partnership team uses what they call βdecision maker personas.β When they hear a company isnβt interested, they ask: Does that person actually represent the companyβs cause partnership strategy?
Thatβs a wicked powerful filter!
Because most companies donβt wake up thinking, How can I sponsor something today? They wake up thinking about sales targets, brand positioning, customer acquisition, channel growth, and ROI.
βSponsorβ isnβt the job. Results are.
Thatβs why the person you need often doesnβt have sponsorship anywhere in their title. And the right title often depends on your offering.
On Thursday, February 26, at 1pm ET, Iβm going live on LinkedIn with the legendary Larry WeilβThe Sponsorship Guyβto dig into one deceptively simple question:
When reaching out about a partnership, who should you actually call?
βππ» Click "Attend" on the event page to get a reminderβ
Weβll cover:
β’ The titles that most often matter
β’ The ones that sound rightβbut usually arenβt
β’ How internal structure matters more than org charts
β’ And how to align your outreach with the way companies actually think
The conversation will run 20β25 minutes. Thatβs it.
Between now and then, Iβd love your input.
π What job title has surprised you?
π Have you ever been blocked by the wrong decision-maker?
π What role actually controls partnership budgets in your experience?
Reply to this email or comment on βLinkedInββweβll bring your insights into the conversation.
Because before you refine your pitch, you need proof youβre talking to the right person.
βππ» Click "Attend" on the event page to get a reminderβ
βοΈ Partnership Notes
A partnership insight that matters.
π βBig partnerships wins arenβt momentsβtheyβre flywheelsβ.
Dominoβs recent $19 million raise for St. Jude Childrenβs Research Hospital isnβt the result of a flashy stunt or one viral push. Itβs the result of repetition. Year after year, the partnership is embedded into store culture, employee engagement, and customer interactions. Each campaign builds credibility. Credibility fuels participation. Participation drives results. Results become proofβand proof makes the next year easier. Thatβs not a campaign. Thatβs a flywheel. The lesson for partnership pros: when proof compounds, momentum stops depending on persuasion.
π€ Marketing Your Cause
One move you should steal.
π’ When you say it, itβs marketing. When someone else says it, itβs credibility.
Two smart takesβone from the βContent Marketing Instituteβ, the other from βAdriana Ticaββmake the same point: trust grows when validation comes from outside your organization. Whether itβs external experts, independent contributors, or credible voices amplifying your message, borrowed authority travels farther than self-promotion. For partnership pros, this matters more than ever. Case studies, testimonials, and social proof donβt just work because they show resultsβthey work because they signal third-party validation. And hereβs the subtle advantage: when someone independent writes and structures that proof, it reads less like marketing and more like proof.
π Cool Jobs in Cause
Find your next adventure.
π€ Lead Director, Corporate Partnerships, Boys & Girls Clubs of America, Multiple Locations
π€ Development Operations Manager, βKeep America Beautifulβ, Remote
π€ Corporate Engagement Manager, βAmerica's Warrior Partnershipβ, Remote
π§ π Brain Food
One thing that's feeding my thinking.
π‘οΈ βThe next competitive moat wonβt be volumeβit will be decencyβ.
This MediaPost article suggests that decencyβlong treated as soft and optionalβmay be the next hard advantage. After years of chasing reach and rewarding sensationalism, the pendulum may be swinging back toward reliability, restraint, and fact-based value. In saturated markets, volume fades fast, but credibility compounds. For partnership pros, thatβs not a feel-good insightβitβs a strategic one. Proof isnβt a supporting asset anymore; itβs the moat. In an era where everyone can publish, only those who can demonstrate real, defensible value will endure.